User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Teleca Q7; Brew 3.1.5; U; xx) 320X240 LGE VX9200
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
Obigo Q 7 Brew 3.1.5Env3mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo Brew 3.1Mobile Phoneyes0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeBrew closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 7closeBrew 3.1.5LGEnv3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2038 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Brew 3.1LGVX9200smartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGVX9200closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo Q7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7 Brew 3.1.5LGEnv3mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGVX-9200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7close LGVX9200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:53 | by ThaDafinser