User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40/3.0FP1; Alcatel-OT-802A/1.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/null
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close AlcatelOT-802Aclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeSymbianOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IBrowse close AlcatelOne Touch 802Adesktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Symbian OS Series 40 AlcatelOT-802Asmartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AlcatelOT-802Acloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.1248 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Ovi Browser Gecko 20100401Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Nokia Xpress Gecko Series40 AlcatelOne Touch 802Amobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IBrowse rclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:53 | by ThaDafinser