User agent detail

40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 60 WINDOWS CE IEMOBILE 612) SP 240X320 HTC_S730
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCS730closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Edge 612closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 612closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE Mobile 612closeWindows HTCS730 Wingsmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IE Mobile 612Trident Windows CE HTCS730smartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 60closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCS730closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 60 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IE Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 60 Windows Mobile HTCS730 Wingsmobile:smartyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IEMobile 612closeWindows CEHTCS730closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:51 | by ThaDafinser