User agent detail

Alcatel-OT-280/1.0 ObigoInternetBrowser/Q03C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close AlcatelOT-280closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 3.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0468 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Alcatel-OT-280 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM AlcatelALCATEL-OT-280mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03C AlcatelOT-280smartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOT-280closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C AlcatelOne Touch 280mobile:featureyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose AlcatelOT-280Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo InternetBrowserclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:50 | by ThaDafinser