User agent detail

T-Mobile Vairy Touch II/5.0 Obigo/Q03C Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo Q 3C Vairy Touch IImobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 3.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
T-Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM ZTET-Mobile Vairy Touch IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q03C T-MobileVairy Touch IIsmartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 03 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.236 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 3C T-MobileVairy Touch IImobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q03Cclose ZTET-Mobile Vairy Touch IIFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q03Cclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:45 | by ThaDafinser