User agent detail

Gregarius/0.5.2 (+http://devlog.gregarius.net/docs/ua)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
yesGregariusBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGregariusRSS0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGregariusclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Gregarius 0.5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

Gregarius 0.5.2close feed-readercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGregariusFeed Reader0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:44 | by ThaDafinser