User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.2; xx; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031006 Firebird/0.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5Windows 8desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.5closeWindows 6.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.7closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firebird 0.7Gecko Windows 8desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firebird 0.7closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firebird 0.7closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firebird 0.7Gecko 20031006Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firebird 0.7Gecko 1.5Windows 8desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firebird 0.7closeWindows 8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:42 | by ThaDafinser