User agent detail

LG-BL40g/v1.0 Browser/Obigo-Q7.3 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGBL40gclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-BL40g v1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGBL40mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGBL40gsmartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.3close LGBL40gcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 7.3 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.1092 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGBL40gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.3 LGBL40gmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGBL40Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGBL40gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:41 | by ThaDafinser