User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20110408 conkeror/0.9.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Conkeror 0.9Gecko Linux Desktop0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Conkeror 0.9closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Conkeror 0.9.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Conkeror 0.9Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Conkeror 0.9.3closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 2.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Conkeror 0.9.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 2.0Gecko 20110408Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2184 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Conkeror 0.9.3Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Conkeror 0.9.3closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:41 | by ThaDafinser