User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090910 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Woothee
v1.3.0
vendor/woothee/woothee-testset/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
UNKNOWN closeLinux closeclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko Linux Desktop0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
SeaMonkey 1.1closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1.23closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.1.18closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2048 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.1.18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.1.18closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1.23closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.1.18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0674 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.1.18Gecko 20090910Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.1.18Gecko 1.8.1Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.1.18closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:40 | by ThaDafinser