User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; en_US) AppleWebKit/534.34 PocketBook/801 (screen 600x800; FW W801.4.1.886)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/ereader/pocketbook.yaml
Webkit 534.34 Color Luxereaderclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Pocket Internet Explorer 5.0 (Linux; en_US) AppleWebKitcloseLinux closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.34closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 534.34 PocketBookColor Luxereaderyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:40 | by ThaDafinser