User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Origyn Web Browser; U; AmigaOS 4.1; xx) AppleWebKit/534.0 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/534.0) OWB/3.32
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
Origyn Webkit 534.0AmigaOS 4.1desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.0468 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 534.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 534.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

OWB closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit AmigaOS 4.1desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeAmigaOS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari WebKit 534.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Origyn Webkit 534.0AmigaOS 4.1desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Oregano Web Browser closeAmigaOS 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:39 | by ThaDafinser