User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-S5628i/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/1.5 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-S5628iclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-GT-S5628i 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Dolfin 1.5closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Dolphin 1.5close SamsungGT-S5628imobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Dolphin 1.5WebKit SamsungGT-S5628ismartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungGT-S5628icloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Dolfin 1.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Dolfin 1.5 SamsungGT-S5628imobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Dolfin 1.5close SamsungGT-S5628icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:37 | by ThaDafinser