User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Id; samsung-gt-b3410w) UCBrowser8.2.0.132/70/452/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunggt-b3410wclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.0468 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close Samsunggt-b3410wmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.2 Samsunggt-b3410wsmartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0close Samsunggt-b3410wcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.1248 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.2.0.132 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Samsunggt-b3410wmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.2.0.132close Samsunggt-b3410wcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:37 | by ThaDafinser