User agent detail

samsung-gt-s3650c/UCWEB8.0.3.99/69/999 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Samsunggt-s3650cclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
samsung-gt-s3650c UCWEB8.0.3.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungCorbymobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.0 Samsunggt-s3650csmartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.0.3close Samsunggt-s3650ccloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 8.0.3.99close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.0.3.99 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.0Gecko Touchwiz SamsungCorbymobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.0.3.99close Samsunggt-s3650ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:35 | by ThaDafinser