User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061101 SeaMonkey/1.1b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
SeaMonkey 1.1bcloseWindows 98 SEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko Win98 98Desktop0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.8.1closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.1bcloseWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.2048 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko Windows 98desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.1bclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.1closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.8.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.1bcloseWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.1bGecko 20061101Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.1Gecko 1.8.1Windows 98desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.1bcloseWindows 98 SEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:33 | by ThaDafinser