User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen 2.0; en-us) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile TizenBrowser/2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/donatj/phpuseragentparser/Tests/user_agents.json
TizenBrowser 2 0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
TizenBrowser 2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mobile Safari closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Tizen 2.0yes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 537.1closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

5.0WebKit 537.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Samsung Browser 2Webkit 537.1Tizen 2.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Tizen Browser 2closeTizen closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:32 | by ThaDafinser