User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mipsel; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; TOSHIBA; RL858; 43.2.54.0; 1; ) ; ToshibaTP/1.1.0 () ; en) AppleWebKit/534.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close TOSHIBARL858closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 534.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Apple Mail closeLinux media-playercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux Toshibatv0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux TOSHIBARL858closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2652 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 534.1 ToshibaRL858 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:29 | by ThaDafinser