User agent detail

curl/7.16.0 (i386-unknown-openbsd4.1) libcurl/7.16.0 OpenSSL/0.9.7j zlib/1.2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
closecloseyesCurlclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yescURLBot/Crawler0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyescURLclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
curl 7.16.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

cURL 7.16.0closeBSD 4.1software-librarycloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
curl 7.16 0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

curl 7.16.0closeOpenBSD 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

cURL 7.16.0 OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesCurlclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
curl 7.16.0closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:27 | by ThaDafinser