User agent detail

MOT-V180ENS/0B.D1.32R MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaV180ENSclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaV180ENSMobile Phoneyes0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MOT-V180ENS 0B.D1.32Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close Motorolav180mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
MotorolaV180ENSsmartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaV180ENScloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola V180ENScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaV180ENSmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close Motorolav180ENSFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0312 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MIB 2.2.1close MotorolaV180ENScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:22 | by ThaDafinser