User agent detail

Opera/9.80 Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.51 UID(00:09:df:33:55:78/S7830/VESTEL/332.8)+CE-HTML;MEM:HIGH
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 S7830televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 12.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 12.51close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.80close media-playercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 12.51Presto 0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 12.51 UID(00:09:df:33:55:78/S7830/VESTEL/332.8)+CE-HTML;MEM:HIGHclose closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.51close closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 12.51close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 12.51Presto 2.12.407 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 VestelS7830televisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.51closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 12.51close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:21 | by ThaDafinser