User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-i677/UCWEB2.0.0.149/47/32079
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSGH-i677closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
SAMSUNG-SGH-i677 UCWEB2.0.0.149closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close SamsungSGH-i677mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.0 SamsungSGH-i677smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.0.0close SamsungSGH-i677closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.0.0.149close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.0.0.149 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2652 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.0Gecko SamsungSGH-i677mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.0.0.149close SamsungSGH-i677closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:20 | by ThaDafinser