User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (QtEmbedded; Linux) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) Kobo eReader Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/ereader/kobo.yaml
Qt Webkit 534.34Linux closecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 534.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 534.34closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.1872 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 534.34WebKit 534.34closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QT based browser WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Qt Webkit 534.34Linux closeclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:19 | by ThaDafinser