User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101031 Firefox-4.0/4.0b8pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Firefox closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firefox closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firefox Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0bcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Beta 4.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firefox -4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firefox Gecko 20101031Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2184 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firefox Gecko 2.0b8Linux desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firefox closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:17 | by ThaDafinser