User agent detail

LG-GU297a/V10eTeleca/Q7.0Profile/MIDP-2.1Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGGU297aclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0624 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-GU297a V10eTelecacloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGGU295mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LGGU297asmartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGGU297acloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

LGLGGU297acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.0P LGGU297amobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGGU295Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7.0Profileclose LGGU297acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:16 | by ThaDafinser