User agent detail

iCab/5.0 CFNetwork/454.12.4 Darwin/10.8.0 (i386) (iMac7%2C1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-icab.yaml
iCab 5.0 Mac OS X 10.6.8desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeDarwin closecloseDesktopclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iCab 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

iCab 5.0closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iCab 5.0WebKit Mac 10.6desktop0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
iCab 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 454.12.4closeMac OS X 10.6.8AppleiMac7,1closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

iCab 5.0closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

iCab 5.0 Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iCab 5.0 Mac OS X 10.6.8desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 5.0closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
iCab 5.0closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:15 | by ThaDafinser