User agent detail

curl/7.19.5 (i586-pc-mingw32msvc) libcurl/7.19.5 zlib/1.2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
curl 7.19.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yescURLBot/Crawler0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyescURLclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
curl 7.19.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

cURL 7.19.5close software-librarycloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
curl 7.19 0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

curl 7.19.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.2184 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

cURL 7.19.5 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesCurlclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
curl 7.19.5close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:11 | by ThaDafinser