User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (Windows 2000; U) Opera 6.03 [ja]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-windows.yaml
Opera 6.03 Windows 2000desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 3.0Gecko Win32 Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 3.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 6.03closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.03closeWindows 2000desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.03Presto Windows 2000desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.03close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.3closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.03 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.03close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.3 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.03 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.03closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.03closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:03 | by ThaDafinser