User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.1; DragonFly) KHTML/4.1.4 (like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Konqueror 4.1closeDragonFly BSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.1KHTML Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.1close closecloseDesktopclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.1closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.1KHTML DragonFly desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.1;close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.1close closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.1closeDragonFly closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.1KHTML 4.1.4DragonFly BSD desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.1closeDragonFly BSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:02 | by ThaDafinser