User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Id; lg-t310) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/405/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGt310closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.0624 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.0468 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close LGt310mobile-browseryescloseclose0.234 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.3 LGt310smartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close LGt310closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.3.0.154 LGLGt310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.3Gecko LGt310mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.3.0.154close LGt310closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:51:00 | by ThaDafinser