User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html) ASProxy/5.5b5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.0624 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesGoogle Botclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Googlebot 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closecloseclosecloseyesGoogleclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesGooglebotclose0.2652 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotCrawler0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Googlebot 2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:56 | by ThaDafinser