User agent detail

PANTECH-C610/AIRCOM04132008 BROWSER/OBIGO/Q05A PROFILE/MIDP-20 CONFIGURATION/CLDC-11 UPLINK/631170
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechC610closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH-C610 AIRCOM04132008closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM PantechC610mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q05A PantechC610smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close PantechC610closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A PantechC610mobile:featureyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close PantechC610Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q05Aclose MeizuM041closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:55 | by ThaDafinser