User agent detail

HTC-Radar 4G/UCWEB2.4.0.188/47/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCRadar 4Gclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
HTC-Radar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser close HTCRadar 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 2.4 HTCRadarsmartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.4.0close HTCRadar 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser 2.4.0.188close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 2.4.0.188 HTC Radarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 2.4Gecko HTCRadar 4Gmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 2.4.0.188close HTCRadarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:55 | by ThaDafinser