User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20120315 OSRE/0.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/browser-nokiaxpress.yaml
Nokia Xpress Gecko 5.0.1 mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 5.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:5.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 5.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.161 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 5.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0.1Gecko 20120315Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.236 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Nokia Xpress Gecko 5.0.1 mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:54 | by ThaDafinser