User agent detail

BIRD V780/1.00 Nucleus RTOS/V1.11.19 MTK6227/06A Release/12.28.2006 Browser/Teleca Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close BirdV780closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
BIRD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM BirdV780mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo MTK / Nucleus BirdV780feature phoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close BirdV780closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0936 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo BirdV780mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close BirdV780Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0312 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Profileclose closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:51 | by ThaDafinser