User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.5 (SonyEricssonJ105i/R1HA035)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
QQ Browser Mini 2.5 Naitemobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MQQBrowser Mini2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QQbrowser Mini2.5close Sony EricssonNaitemobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QQ Browser 2.5 Sony EricssonNaitefeature phoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.5close SonyEricssonJ105icloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QQ Browser Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J105icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QQ Browser Mini 2.5 Sony EricssonNaitemobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MQQBrowser Mini2.5close SonyEricssonJ105icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:50 | by ThaDafinser