User agent detail

Opera/6.01 (Windows XP; U) [de]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknownunknown0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 6.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 6.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 6.01Presto Windows XPdesktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 6.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 6.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 6.01closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 6.1 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 6.01 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 6.01closeWindows XP Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 6.01closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:47 | by ThaDafinser