User agent detail

PhilipsX800/1.0 MTK6229/07A Release/10.06.2008 Browser/Obigo2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PhilipsX800closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.0312 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.0468 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PhilipsX800 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM PhilipsX800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo MTK / Nucleus PhilipsX800smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close PhilipsX800closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 2.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo 2.0 PhilipsX800mobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close PhilipsX800Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:47 | by ThaDafinser