User agent detail

MobileKeeper/BASIC/1033/ms_wm6professional/01.06.2718.0001 WindowsMobile6/Windows Mobile 6 Professional/HTC/HTC Touch Pro2 T7373/5.2.21884.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCTouch Pro2 T7373closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MobileKeeper BASICcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeWindows closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows Mobile 6HTCTouch Pro 2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows Mobile HTCTouch Pro2smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch Pro2 T7373closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2194 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows Mobile 6HTCTouch Pro 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows Mobile HTC Touch Pro2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:47 | by ThaDafinser