User agent detail

WhatsApp/2.11.356 WP7/7.10.8107 Device/SAMSUNG-GT-I8350-H23.15.0.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungGT-I8350-H23closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/app-chat.yaml
WhatsApp 2.11 Windows Phone 7.10Omnia Wmobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
WhatsApp 0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
WhatsApp close closecloseclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
WhatsApp 2.11.356closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SamsungGT-I8350-H23.15.0.8mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
WhatsApp 2.11 SamsungGT-I8350smartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-I8350-H23closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.2496 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
WhatsApp 2.11 Windows Phone 7.10SamsungOmnia Wmobile:smartyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
WhatsApp 2.11.356close SamsungGT-I8350-H23.15.0.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:46 | by ThaDafinser