User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131030 conkeror/1.0pre (Debian-1.0~~pre+git131116-1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Conkeror 1.0Gecko Debian 1.0desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Conkeror 1.0Gecko Linux Desktop0.0624 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Conkeror 1.0closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.0468 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 17.0closeDebian closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Conkeror 1.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Conkeror 1.0Gecko Debian 1.0desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Conkeror 1.0closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 17.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.1414 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Conkeror 1.0precloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.0946 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 17.0Gecko 20131030Linux 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4212 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Conkeror 1.0Gecko 17.0Debian desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Conkeror 1.0precloseDebian GNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:44 | by ThaDafinser