User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 SlimerJS/0.9.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
SlimerJS 0.9Gecko unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
SlimerJS 0.9Gecko Linux Desktop0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
SlimerJS 0.9closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 36.0closeUbuntu closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:36.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Ubuntu desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 36.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 36.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 36.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 36.0Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:43 | by ThaDafinser