User agent detail

Opera/7.0 (Windows 2000; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-windows.yaml
Opera 7.0 Windows 2000desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 7.0Presto 1.0Win2000 5.0Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 7.0closeWindows 2000desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 7.0Presto Windows 2000desktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.0closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 7.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0624 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 7.0 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 7.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 7.0closeWindows 2000 Desktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 7.0closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:42 | by ThaDafinser