User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; lworld spider 1.0; Windows NT 5.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
lworld spider 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.0Gecko WinXP 5.1Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 4.0closeWinXP closecloseDesktopclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyeslworld spiderclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.0 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:34 | by ThaDafinser