User agent detail

J-PHONE/4.1/J-SA51_a/SNJSAA1000513 SA/0001JP Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 Ext-Profile/JSCL-1.1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
J-SA51mobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
J-PHONE 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SanyoJ-SA51mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SoftbankJ-SA51smartphoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SanyoJ-SA51mobile:featureyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile J-SA51_acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SoftbankJ-SA51Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:31 | by ThaDafinser