User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; KDDI-TS3B) Opera 8.60 [ja]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/carrier-kddi.yaml
Opera Mobile 8.60 W51Tmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 6.0Trident Desktop0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0close closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0close closecloseDesktopclose0 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 8.60close ToshibaW51Tdesktop-browsercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 8.60Presto KDDITS3Bfeature phoneyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60close closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0.1404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 8.60 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Mobile 8.60 ToshibaW51Tmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer TS3Bcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close KDDIW45TFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.0312 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 8.60close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:29 | by ThaDafinser