User agent detail

Opera/9.27 (Windows NT 5.1; U; de)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera 9.27Presto Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.27Presto 2.0WinXP 5.1Desktop0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.27closeWinXP closecloseDesktopclose0.0312 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.27closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.2184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.27Presto Windows XPdesktop0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.27closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.27closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.27 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.27closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.27 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.27 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 9.27closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.27closeWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:27 | by ThaDafinser