User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 WebTV/2.6 (compatible; MSIE 4.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close Generic_InettvWebTVclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
WebTV/MSNTV 2.6 Win32 MicrosoftWebTVTV Device0.0156 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
WebTV/MSNTV 2.6closeWin32 closecloseTV Deviceclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 4.0closeWindows 2.6media-playercloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Internet Explorer 4.0Trident WebTV 2.6Web TVtvyes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
WebTV 2.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.0closeWebTV 2.6WebTVcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 4.0closeWebTV 2.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebTV 2.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 4.0 MicrosoftWebTVtelevisioncloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 4.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:23 | by ThaDafinser