User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 CommonCrawler Node MNATI3RZFBD6ZTQNRVQGXBDCQOEXIA4CIDEUKNYZDF3MJSH5G7BCQ5EMADE5TLF.MHCZ3LLTWGHIHMYLM.YFBJBHE6R2YQTHOTJ3N5BGFP457JRX4AJRXGAJYGDAANRY24.cdn0.common.crawl.zone
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-865.php
yesCommonCrawler NodeBot/Crawler0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesCommonCrawler NodeBot/Crawler0.0624 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesCommonCrawler Nodeclose0.0624 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.0156 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesCommonCrawlerclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5E closeclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:21 | by ThaDafinser