User agent detail

htc star trek/UC Browser7.9.0.102/70/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close HTCstar trekclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
UC Browser 7.9closeAndroid closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.0156 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
htc closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
UCBrowser close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

UC Browser 7.9.0.102close HTCstar trekmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2028 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 7.9 HTCstar treksmartphoneyes0.0156 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0close HTCstar trekcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 7.9.0.102 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.234 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 7.9Gecko HTCstar trekmobile:featureyescloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.0156 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 7.9.0.102close HTCstarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 07:50:20 | by ThaDafinser